Home · Case studies · Haul Speed Case Study
Case study · cement limestone mine · 45+ machines

Case study: the pit moved farther, and TPH held

At an Indian cement limestone mine with more than 45 machines, Minocular fused GPS cycle traces with shift-report TPH and fuel LPH. The crusher lead grew from 2.20 to 2.52 km, but loaded haul speed rose from 16.1 to 17.1 km/h, so dumper TPH held at 176–177 t/h and dumper LPH fell from 39 to 37 L/h.

01 Problem

Every trip to the crusher got longer

As the pit advanced, the lead distance from face to crusher grew by about a third of a kilometre. A longer haul usually means fewer tonnes per dumper-hour.

2.20 → 2.52 km
crusher lead, Apr-25 → Apr-26
02 Data

Three sources joined

GPS cycle traces gave lead distance and loaded haul speed for every trip. These were joined with TPH from the shift report and litres per hour from the fuel sensors.

GPS × TPH × LPH
data fused
Haul Road AI →
03 Result

Faster loaded hauls absorbed the distance

Loaded haul speed rose, so tonnes per dumper-hour did not fall, and diesel per hour went down rather than up.

16.1 → 17.1 km/h
loaded haul speed, Dec-25 → Sep-26
176 → 177 t/h
dumper TPH, Jan → Sep 2026
39 → 37 L/h
dumper LPH, Nov-25 → Apr-26

Questions about haul speed case study

What did the mine measure?

Crusher lead distance and loaded haul speed from GPS cycle traces, dumper TPH from the shift report, and dumper litres per hour from fuel sensors.

What were the results?

Lead distance grew from 2.20 to 2.52 km, loaded haul speed rose from 16.1 to 17.1 km/h, dumper TPH held at 176–177 t/h and dumper LPH fell from 39 to 37 L/h.

Why did TPH not fall on a longer haul?

Faster loaded hauls absorbed the extra distance, with no extra diesel per hour.

What kind of mine was it?

A cement limestone mine in India with more than 45 machines on Minocular.

Can this run at other mines?

Yes, at any mine with GPS on the dumpers and a shift TPH report. Fuel sensors add the LPH view.

See what your haul cycle is doing.
Book a Demo